November 10, 1970 Pg 2-3 |
Previous | 16 of 47 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
A statement by the Daily Collegian staff The recommendations made by the newly formed Editorial Advisory Board concerning Daily CoUegtan policy came as no surprise to those of us on the CoUegtan staff. We have long suspected the advisory board would be used aa a poUUcal tool by the Baxter admlnlstraUon to "leglU- rolze* the curtailment of our freedoms. No matter how many disclaimers the administration wlU issue after this statement appears, we feel It Is only a matter of Ume before we are silenced and the Collegian Is transformed Into a mouthpiece for the administration and Board of Trustees. We w the n f the Editorial Advisory Board as the first step In that process. If It isn't already apparent, the advisory board Is stacked against the Collegian In favor of the conservative Department of Journalism and the administration. That comes as no great sur- Student Body President Bill Jones, and Dr. John Duke, chairman of the Journalism department, appointed by 'the faculty of the Journalism department. A fifth member of the board, nominated by the Board of Publlca- Uons and appointed by Baxter, has yet to be named. The advisory board suffers from an Incredible lackofUberal and student representation. The only student on the board, David Fox, has a built-in conflict of interest. He Is stlU closely tied to the Journalism department and Insight, and presently works with Bill Jones In the capacity of a public relauons aide. It is no secret that relations between the Jones admlnlstraUon and theCol- leglan are not the best in the world. We therefore seriously question Fox's ability to remain Collegian by Popovlch concerning the board's recommendations, we would be hard put to classify his thinking as either progressive or liberal. 'Professionals' We therefore conclude that no attempt has been made to balance the Editorial Advisory Board. To be sure, the board Is composed for the most part of "professionals," but It cannot be said; to represent the profession. It rep- * school of thought schools of The Editorial Advisory Board's The » field with n suggested forml Objectivity n the fl t place It was Baxter'; Dick of the Community Relations Office, who played a key role in getUng a new and Inexperienced Board of Publications to accept his plan for the board's composition. (Dick is Baxter's representative on the Board of Publi- We also question the objectivity and fairness of Dr. John Duke, partment. Of all the members on the advisory board, Duke Is the most hostile to the Collegian. He played a key role In severing his department's relations with the Collegian when theStudentSenate affirmed the Board on Publication's policy of He has long been critical COLLEGIAN FORUM •general welfare of the stu- with the Board on Publications' : body and the coUege. We have and Student Senate's Judgment i it ail before. We know how that the special editions do in- games Is played, and we deed serve the generalwelfareof ■ this ad- the student body and coUege as a George Popovlch, In explaining the board's feeUngs about the special editions to members of our staff, said It was the board's feeling they were nothing but •propaganda." What that means is anyone's guess, but the tone is clearly racist. It Is possible Popovlch and others on the board are under the mistaken Impression the primary function of the special editions Is a "news* function. It Is well understood by those dealing directly with the special editions that they are a were brimming with 'professional* arrogance, bigotry and a total lack of understanding about the nature and role of student newspapers. «t blatant Indiscretion e black, c Opinions editorials, including feature- editorials and commentaries by guest writers, are not necessarily those of Fresno State CoUege or the student body. THE DAILY COLLEGI.'N passing Judgment on us. Until the conflicts o left, a right profession, international students special editions in terms of the Board on Publications' policy on the existence of these papers. The Board on Publications, In a meeting last month, passed a motion specifically requesUng that the advisory board pass no Judgment regarding their legitimacy. The advisory board was to make recommendations concerning the validity only of special other areas of the campus, (I.e. Academic Senate, Women's Lib- Athletlcs Department, by minority groups to explain their feelings and aspirations to the restof the college community. They are for all Intents and purposes a four-page weekly commentary devoted to enlightening the white middle-class majority on campus. /»* Misunderstanding In that respect the special editions are In harmony with the functions of a college newspaper. The main function of a college paper Is to serve as a forum for opinion and comment. That this Is the main function of a college newspaper Is little understood by the Baxter administration, the Board of Trustees and many others Inside and i lege community. The news fui , although an Important e element. College newspapers differ with other newspapers In that they serve an Intellectual community In an environment supposedly ar change of ideas and vigorous Blacks and chlcanos represent new and much needed lr campus. They have thing f liar, and should so. How this either through supplement or something been debated ever since of minority representa- he Collegian came up. LETTERS TO THE EDITOR that one of the greatest cornerstones of Its foundation Is Us Christian ethics. The cry Is heard that we as a nation must uphold our ChrlsUan principles and disavow the, -harbingers of hate.* The disenchanted young are told assuredly to work within our , great system and change it thereby. Andyet this poUUcal campaign offers ample evidence of why so VIGIL (Continued from Page 1) THE DAILY COLLEGIAN 3 Collegian statement (Continued from Page 2) ireaslng the Collegian staff and lumber of pages Is highly de- irable. Editors of the Collegian iave been pushing for a larger iewspaper and staff since last ear. It has been their belief hat what Is happening through- le country and In California It is our teeUng that cover f these areas In addition ti events will give all of us I understanding and per il to <k 1 with Again, we believe the advisory lard's suggestion to limit space the editor and editorials results in the board's basic misunderstanding of a college newspaper's role on campus. We are the only campus-wide forum available to students for the expression of Ideas and opinions. To greatly curtail space available to such a (unction Is to negate ourprlmary ever, that since its Inception the Collegian has maintained a policy of covering news, sports and cultural events In addition to providing an open forum. We feel we have provided a reasonable balance between all four areas and therefore, must view the board's suggestion to limit editorial space as unjustified and based on prejudice rather than sound One-sided reporting The Editorial Advisory Board's last recommendation Is the most misleading of all. The board said that, "numerous Instances of inaccurate and one-sided re"portlng of the Dally Collegian, and the advisory board urges the Collegian editor (Burton Swope) and his staff to seek out contrasting and opposing views In ordertodouble check the accuracy of a news item and in order to present both sides. A lack of accuracy and one-sided reporting discredit a newspaper In the eyes of ltspub- The . i board failed t< sided reporting In i pers. The question is one of degree. While admitting that we have made mistakes and not every side has always been heard from, we feel we have done a reaonsably good Job in reporting news stories. What mistakes have and In most cases Immediately corrected. The Collegian has tried to seek' out contrasting views In reporting news stories. Sometimes that is difficult on a campus experiencing a wave of repression, and where most of Us members Uve In fearand distrust ofthelr peers. It is difficult at times to get the other side whei wlU not talk to c when they are always "out for the day* or "tied up In a meeting." It Is difficult to obtain contrasting views when faculty are so frightened of losing their Jobs they would rather remain silent and unnoticed rather than outspoken and under scrutiny. Opposite sHojl What- e advisory board has done In making such a recommendation public is Just the op posite of Its Intent. In and of Itself It has the effect of destroying reader confidence in the Daily Collegian. No matter how hard we have tried in the past and will try in ihe future to give our readers balanced and well- rounded coverage, we have been stigmatized as a paper given to "inaccuracy and one-sided stories?" In that respect the board has done more damage to the Collegian than a staff of incom- In conclusion, we find the performance of the Editorial Advisory Board unsatisfactory. We see dangers In its continued operation. The advisory board sounded like a good Idea as long as It was theory, but In practice it has turned out to be detrlmen- the Student Senate to either radically alter Its functions and composition or to abolish It. It Is confusing vital issues, slandering the Collegian, and serving only the forces of repression and reaction on campus. -The Dally Collegian Editors and Staff Involved. Are we being asked to become Involved so that we, too, may stand up in an official capacity, call our fellow man a lying son- ofabltch? To become so wrapped up In a position within a hierarchy that we hold an opponent to be a vote for anarchy? Attempt to use a position of power to strip our elders of their last vestiges of human dignity by shunting them Into prison-like Are we to emulate these "officers of the public trust- who continually tax the working man's pocketbook to allay waste In government spending yet grant corporations tremendous tax benefits? In an economy that produces $900 billion worth of goods and services yearly, shall we emulate those who worry about a man who makes off with $5,000 from welfare, and yet rewrite tax laws to allow corporations Shall the young emulate these men such that they lie and cheat? And if these be good men, what Is It In our society that makes good men strike constantly at Which American ethic are the young to adopt? The religious ethic we pay Up service to which says love your fellow man, or the politico-corporate ethic who says step on your fellow man so that you might officially recognized La Mesa. Directlva because of the administration's denial to acknowledge this group, Vigil stated any Individuals or groups recommending any person (or persons) for La Raza faculty will be beard development of La Raza Studies, the community, the students, and the administration. "As a community we see no real future for La Raza Studies on this campus or any other program which-is supposed to meet What about La Raza classes? Vigil explained that whatever courses are offered wlU depend on the hired faculty's speclaU- zaUon In their areas of major. •The college has every Intention of having a La Raza Studies program and the end result will be revealed In the spring,* he said. 'Whatever develops depends on the committee's and administration's decisions on formal course offerings.* Pickett, disputing Vigil's statements, said, "It seems absurd that Baxter's LaRazaCommittee can't recognize the future nlty/ he stated. •Until this administration (and La Raza Studies committee) attempt to develop a progressive relationship with the Chlcanos, there cannot be any change from that direction from which this institution was founded, which excludes Chlcanos and Blacks from equal and full participation. •Ultimately, the Chicano community will not let its existence on this campus be seduced by those who persist to dictate what Is right and what is wrong on determining our own future/ I. Brough TUNE-UP SPECIAL! Includes replacing spark plugs, points, boil carburetor, adjust . liming and adjust valves. <2Dxf oro Motors Complete Transmission and Engine Repair 3953 N. Blackstone Telephone 229-8818 At Fresno State who gets asked out more often than anyone else? The Oly Picnic Tap & 120 paper cups Get enough Oly to to last. Call Target Sales, 268-6671, for the nearest Olympia draft outlet And ask about our go-anywhere kegs with the new Oly Picnic Tap. Olympia Brewing Company, Tumwater, Washington. "Oly •
Object Description
Title | 1970_11 The Daily Collegian November 1970 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1970 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Description
Title | November 10, 1970 Pg 2-3 |
Alternative Title | Daily Collegian (California State University, Fresno) |
Publisher | Associated Students of Fresno State, Fresno, Calif. |
Publication Date | 1970 |
Description | Daily (except weedends) during the school year. Microfilm. Palo Alto, Calif.: BMI Library Microfilms, 1986- microfilm reels; 35 mm. Vol.1, no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- |
Subject | California State University, Fresno -- Periodicals. |
Contributors | Associated Students of Fresno State. |
Coverage | Vol.1 no.1 (Feb 8, 1922)- to present |
Format | Microfilm reels, 35 mm. |
Technical Information | Scanned at 600 dpi; TIFF; Microfilm ScanPro 2000 "E-image data" |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search |
A statement by the Daily Collegian staff
The recommendations made by
the newly formed Editorial Advisory Board concerning Daily
CoUegtan policy came as no surprise to those of us on the CoUegtan staff. We have long suspected the advisory board would be
used aa a poUUcal tool by the
Baxter admlnlstraUon to "leglU-
rolze* the curtailment of our
freedoms.
No matter how many disclaimers the administration wlU issue
after this statement appears, we
feel It Is only a matter of Ume
before we are silenced and the
Collegian Is transformed Into a
mouthpiece for the administration and Board of Trustees. We
w the n
f the
Editorial Advisory Board as the
first step In that process.
If It isn't already apparent,
the advisory board Is stacked
against the Collegian In favor of
the conservative Department of
Journalism and the administration. That comes as no great sur-
Student Body President Bill
Jones, and Dr. John Duke, chairman of the Journalism department, appointed by 'the faculty
of the Journalism department. A
fifth member of the board, nominated by the Board of Publlca-
Uons and appointed by Baxter,
has yet to be named.
The advisory board suffers
from an Incredible lackofUberal
and student representation. The
only student on the board, David
Fox, has a built-in conflict of
interest. He Is stlU closely tied
to the Journalism department and
Insight, and presently works with
Bill Jones In the capacity of a
public relauons aide. It is no
secret that relations between the
Jones admlnlstraUon and theCol-
leglan are not the best in the
world. We therefore seriously
question Fox's ability to remain
Collegian by Popovlch concerning
the board's recommendations, we
would be hard put to classify his
thinking as either progressive or
liberal.
'Professionals'
We therefore conclude that no
attempt has been made to balance
the Editorial Advisory Board. To
be sure, the board Is composed
for the most part of "professionals," but It cannot be said; to
represent the profession. It rep-
* school of thought
schools of
The Editorial Advisory Board's
The
» field with n
suggested forml
Objectivity
n the fl
t place
It was Baxter';
Dick of the Community Relations
Office, who played a key role in
getUng a new and Inexperienced
Board of Publications to accept
his plan for the board's composition. (Dick is Baxter's representative on the Board of Publi-
We also question the objectivity
and fairness of Dr. John Duke,
partment. Of all the members on
the advisory board, Duke Is the
most hostile to the Collegian. He
played a key role In severing his
department's relations with the
Collegian when theStudentSenate
affirmed the Board on Publication's policy of
He has long been critical
COLLEGIAN FORUM
•general welfare of the stu- with the Board on Publications'
: body and the coUege. We have and Student Senate's Judgment
i it ail before. We know how that the special editions do in-
games Is played, and we deed serve the generalwelfareof
■ this ad- the student body and coUege as a
George Popovlch, In explaining
the board's feeUngs about the
special editions to members of
our staff, said It was the board's
feeling they were nothing but
•propaganda." What that means
is anyone's guess, but the tone is
clearly racist. It Is possible
Popovlch and others on the board
are under the mistaken Impression the primary function of the
special editions Is a "news* function. It Is well understood by
those dealing directly with the
special editions that they are a
were brimming with 'professional* arrogance, bigotry and a
total lack of understanding about
the nature and role of student
newspapers.
«t blatant Indiscretion
e black, c
Opinions
editorials, including feature-
editorials and commentaries by
guest writers, are not necessarily those of Fresno State CoUege
or the student body.
THE DAILY COLLEGI.'N
passing Judgment on us.
Until the
conflicts o
left, a right
profession,
international students special
editions in terms of the Board
on Publications' policy on the existence of these papers. The
Board on Publications, In a meeting last month, passed a motion
specifically requesUng that the
advisory board pass no Judgment
regarding
their legitimacy. The advisory
board was to make recommendations concerning the validity only
of special
other areas of the campus, (I.e.
Academic Senate, Women's Lib-
Athletlcs Department,
by minority groups to explain
their feelings and aspirations to
the restof the college community.
They are for all Intents and purposes a four-page weekly commentary devoted to enlightening
the white middle-class majority
on campus.
/»* Misunderstanding
In that respect the special editions are In harmony with the
functions of a college newspaper.
The main function of a college
paper Is to serve as a forum for
opinion and comment. That this Is
the main function of a college
newspaper Is little understood by
the Baxter administration, the
Board of Trustees and many
others Inside and i
lege community. The news fui
, although an Important e
element. College newspapers differ with other newspapers In that
they serve an Intellectual community In an environment supposedly ar
change of ideas and vigorous
Blacks and chlcanos represent
new and much needed lr
campus. They have
thing f
liar, and should
so. How this
either through
supplement or
something
been debated ever since
of minority representa-
he Collegian came up.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
that one of the greatest cornerstones of Its foundation Is Us
Christian ethics. The cry Is heard
that we as a nation must uphold
our ChrlsUan principles and disavow the, -harbingers of hate.*
The disenchanted young are told
assuredly to work within our
, great system and change it thereby.
Andyet this poUUcal campaign
offers ample evidence of why so
VIGIL
(Continued from Page 1)
THE DAILY COLLEGIAN 3
Collegian statement
(Continued from Page 2)
ireaslng the Collegian staff and
lumber of pages Is highly de-
irable. Editors of the Collegian
iave been pushing for a larger
iewspaper and staff since last
ear. It has been their belief
hat what Is happening through-
le country and In California
It is our teeUng that cover
f these areas In addition ti
events will give all of us I
understanding and per
il to |