March 1997 Page 5 |
Previous | 5 of 8 | Next |
|
|
This page
All
|
Loading content ...
March 1997 Hye Sharzhoom 5 A Semester at Berkeley By Dr. Dickran Kouymjian What was it like to teach at Berkeley? I have been asked that many times since returning to Fresno. Not much different than teaching at Fresno State. The best students in my classes at the University of California were about the same as the best students at Fresno State, except mat there were proportionately more of them in an average class up there. The teaching load is more merciful at Berkeley, usually two courses instead o f the four at Fresno. But each course is four credits instead of the three here and meets four hours a week, so it is eight hours of lectures versus twelve at CSUF. Classes are on the whole bigger and so is the campus and the student body, twice the size. The greatest difference seems to be the general seriousness of purpose one feels at UCB, and I suppose at any UC campus, because they are universities which are considered research institutions awarding the doctorate in nearly every discipline. Thus, even on the undergraduate level the competition is clearly felt. Students want their money's worth (tuition is several times higher than at Fresno State) and insist on getting it. At the beginning of the semester the average student shops around attending up to ten courses in the first two or three weeks or multiple sections of the same course before finally deciding which one offers the best instruction. I was warned by staff and faculty that class size in the first weeks can be inflated by as much as 50% and was even discouraged from taking attendance, and reporting absences. Student attitudes toward work and grading are both similar to Fresno State and different. There was the same complaining about grades. On the other hand written assignments were handed in remarkably promptly, with students demanding precision about due dates. Students also made much more use of office hours, to such a point that I had to schedule a sign up sheet some weeks. Some stu dents came back over and again setting up a barely disguised private tutorial. This seriousness seemed to be a reflection of students as interested in getting an education as getting their degrees. I was pleasantly surprised during my first weeks on campus in August and September to have been asked by secretarial and administrative staff, "Is there anything else we can do for you to make sure you are giving our students the best education they can get?" This is a literal quotation that was repeated three times to me from three different sectors of the campus and I wondered if it was in the policy manual, a kind of greeting like grocery store clerks -;^ who say hello to each customary at the cash register. I discovered it was a genuine concern. Berkeley has its problems, for sure. I was told that it has the lowest graduation rate in the UC system and that probably many fewer freshman finally end up with their degrees than Fresno State students. My specific experiences involved my duties as the second William Saroyan Visiting Professor of Armenian Studies. This endowed chair program has been trying for a decade to raise sufficient private funds to establish a regular fulltime position at UC Berkeley, similar to the ones at UCLA and Fresno State. In 1995 they bad enough of an endowment to invite a professor for one semester, thus creating a visiting position until such time as the endowment allowed for a regular professor. Administratively I was in four different sections of the university with four separate mailboxes! The Saroyan Chair is housed in the Slavic and East European Studies Program, which in turn is part of International and Area Studies. I taught an upper division English Department course on William Saroyan (only appropriateconcern- ing the clever naming ofthe chair) and a second course on Armenian Cinema in the Film Studies Program, part of the Department of Rhetoric. Each department integrated me wholly and offered me office space, a mailbox, an e-mail address, but unfortunately a computer only with great difficulty. Among the rewards of the experience was teaching William Saroyan to English majors, a rare occurrence for the Saroyan course aHvr-'~- ■ .-■• which at Fresno State is listed only under Armenian Studies. I was not surprised that some English majors had never read Saroyan, but I was disturbed thatseveral confessed that they had never heard of him. Of my 24 students, mostly English majors, only four were Armenian. Encouraged by their enthusiasm for the subject and the quality of their writing and thinking, I decided to organize a Saroyan conference to commemorate the 15th anniversary of the author's death. With class help, one student handled the publicity, another the conference program, we were able to invite the world's leading Saroyan scholars for a conference entitled "Saroyan Plus Fifteen" held on campus on November 15. Since the conference has been widely reported on, even in Hye Sharzhoom, I wish only to relate that aspect of it that was the most interesting to me. At first I thought, some of mese students could present papers on Saroyan as good as those of the professors being invited so why not extend the conference one day to have a student session? Class participation was optional and extra credit. Five students (all upper division English majors) were willing to try it. Eventually, only two stuck it out, Michael Kovacs and Michael Kloster, but they were joined by a third student, Micah Jendian from San Diego State, who had taken my Saroyan course in Fresno. In the end, I judged it would be segregation to put the three on a separate student panel and insisted that their papers be integrated into regular sessions of the conference. Certainly this was one of themostpositive experiences during my Berkeley stay. All the students were behind their classmates, who, ap- prehensive about being on the same platform with the very experts whose books they were quoting, wrote and rewrote their essays. They had a dry run in class with heavy questioning and criticism. I assured them continually that the work they were doing was as good as the experts and that the level of their own preparation would be on a par with that ofthe scholars present. In fact the three students, two undergraduates from Berkeley and one graduate from San Diego, gave what were recognized by everyone as three ofthe best papers in the conference. A member of Berkeley's own English Department also read a paper on Saroyan and the conference raised the conscience of English literature specialists, especially a new crop of them, toward the merits of Saroyan's craft. The experience in the film course was somewhat different, but equally surprising. A weekly showing and lecture in a large audio visual auditorium on Monday nights attracted 40 to 50 students, including in this course a large number of Armenian community auditors. The regular students were almost all film majors, 15 out of 25, only five of them Armenians. Obviously, film majors just look at movies differently than non-film majors. Thus, when discussing a film like Queen Christina directed by Rouben Mamoulian and starring Greta Garbo, they found Armenian connections that I never saw myself in the direction. Mamoulian never made a single film with Armenian content in it, yet the non-Armenian students especially continued to develop themes that turned around exile and Diaspora. This happened time and again with other films. On the other hand, some Armenian auditors always wanted to turn discussion of Armenian language films or even films by Atom Egoyan or William Saroyan toward its Armenian nationalist content; thus, on more than one occasion I was forced to move the post-film discussion toward the cinematographic qualities of a film. In a film course with determined film majors the quality of filming, scripting, acting, and overall cohesiveness is primary, and political or national messages secondary. The auditors hopefully learned something from the extraordinary input of young film specialists who had never previously seen a film by or about Armenians. Ultimately the most valuable part of such a teaching experience is to once again leave your home institution, your own students, to see how things are done elsewhere. It affords new perspectives and fires one up with new energies. In mid-December I discovered I had a fifth mailbox in the Program on undergraduate studies, and even though I found my first three pay vouchers two months late in my fourth mailbox, I just didn't have the courage to go across campus to empty one more. Who knows what I missed? Two Major Supporters of Armenian Studies Pass Away Within a week during the last days of February and the first days of March death came to Isabel Berberian and Meline' Kalfayan. Their names were familiar to hundreds of students and supporters of the Armenian Studies Program. The first endowed chair in Armenian Studies and the first chair to become operative on the campus of California State University, Fresno bears the name of Haig and Isabel Berberian. I have had the honor to be the first incumbent of that chair, named after the Berberians thanks to a most generous donation from Isabel and Haig's daughter Dianne and son-in-law Dr. Arnold Gazarian. Next year will mark the tenth anniversary ofthe Berberian endowment. Mrs. Berberian had been in failing health for many months. Her husband had passed away in 1987 and she continued herjife in Modesto surrounded by the Gazarians and her four grandchildren: Janalee married to Brian Melikian, Michelle married to Dr. John Arakelian, Rena married to Wayne Rutledge, and Alyssa. The Berberians, both Isabel and Haig, were characterized by discretion and gentleness. Their attachment to the Fresno community, including Armenian institutions like the church and the Armenians Studies Program and their generosity to it, is reflected in the continuing public service of the Gazarians. Arnold Gazarian serves as the Chair ofthe Armenian Studies Program Advisory Board and together with Dianne have stood behind us at all times. I also had the good fortune to teach two of Isabel Berberian's grandchildren, Rena and Alyssa. In one of those unlucky coincidences that life seems to reserve for us, Meline' Kalfayan passed away the day of Mrs. Berberian's funeral. She had been in and out the hospital frequently these past months, but seemed each time to bounce back with her perennial optimism. She and her husband Sarkis (Sam) Kalfayan established a special endowment fund in 1991 for the support ofthe newly created Center for Armenian Studies on the CSU Fresno campus. The Sarkis and Meline Kalfayan Center for Armenian Studies includes in it the John Garabedian Director's office, the Sahatdjian Library, and the Avedian Archives. As the first Director of the Kalfayan Center and the Armenian Studies Program it houses, I have felt assured of the future of Armenian Studies at Fresno State due in part to the Kalfayan endowment which will continue to benefit in the years and decades to come through the Kalfayan's estate. Sarkis Kalfayan served for six years as the first Chair ofthe Armenian Studies Program Advisory Board and he and Melin6 have stood steadfast in their support of Armenia and Armenian Studies. More than once in difficult moments, whether it be the need for computers at our sister institution, Yerevan State University, or aid to bring over exchange students from Armenia, Sarkis and Melin6 were ready to help. Melius was active in community affairs as member ofthe Eastern Star, Daughters ofthe Nile, and Daughters of the Vartan. I had the pleasure of Meline's gracious hospitality more than once. I also had met her father, the scholar Hovaness Babessian, at the Cilician Catholicosate in Antelias, Lebanon while he was doing research in the late 1950s. On behalf of the Armenian Studies Program, its faculty, staff, and students, and in the name ofthe Advisory Board, I would like to extend our deepest condolences to Dianne and Arnold Gazarian and their family and to Sarkis Kalfayan, and to thank mem for their constant support of our work. Dickran Kouymjian Haig & Isabel Berberian Professor of Armenian Studies Director, The Sarkis and Meline Kalfayan Center for Armenian Studies
Object Description
Title | 1997_03 Hye Sharzhoom Newspaper March 1997 |
Alternative Title | Armenian Action, Vol. 18 No. 3, March 1997; Ethnic Supplement to the Collegian. |
Publisher | Armenian Studies Program, California State University, Fresno. |
Publication Date | 1997 |
Description | Published two to four times a year. The newspaper of the California State University, Fresno Armenian Students Organization and Armenian Studies Program. |
Subject | California State University, Fresno – Periodicals. |
Contributors | Armenian Studies Program; Armenian Students Organization, California State University, Fresno. |
Coverage | 1979-2014 |
Format | Newspaper print |
Language | eng |
Full-Text-Search | Scanned at 200-360 dpi, 18-bit greyscale - 24-bit color, TIFF or PDF. PDFs were converted to TIF using Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro. |
Description
Title | March 1997 Page 5 |
Full-Text-Search | March 1997 Hye Sharzhoom 5 A Semester at Berkeley By Dr. Dickran Kouymjian What was it like to teach at Berkeley? I have been asked that many times since returning to Fresno. Not much different than teaching at Fresno State. The best students in my classes at the University of California were about the same as the best students at Fresno State, except mat there were proportionately more of them in an average class up there. The teaching load is more merciful at Berkeley, usually two courses instead o f the four at Fresno. But each course is four credits instead of the three here and meets four hours a week, so it is eight hours of lectures versus twelve at CSUF. Classes are on the whole bigger and so is the campus and the student body, twice the size. The greatest difference seems to be the general seriousness of purpose one feels at UCB, and I suppose at any UC campus, because they are universities which are considered research institutions awarding the doctorate in nearly every discipline. Thus, even on the undergraduate level the competition is clearly felt. Students want their money's worth (tuition is several times higher than at Fresno State) and insist on getting it. At the beginning of the semester the average student shops around attending up to ten courses in the first two or three weeks or multiple sections of the same course before finally deciding which one offers the best instruction. I was warned by staff and faculty that class size in the first weeks can be inflated by as much as 50% and was even discouraged from taking attendance, and reporting absences. Student attitudes toward work and grading are both similar to Fresno State and different. There was the same complaining about grades. On the other hand written assignments were handed in remarkably promptly, with students demanding precision about due dates. Students also made much more use of office hours, to such a point that I had to schedule a sign up sheet some weeks. Some stu dents came back over and again setting up a barely disguised private tutorial. This seriousness seemed to be a reflection of students as interested in getting an education as getting their degrees. I was pleasantly surprised during my first weeks on campus in August and September to have been asked by secretarial and administrative staff, "Is there anything else we can do for you to make sure you are giving our students the best education they can get?" This is a literal quotation that was repeated three times to me from three different sectors of the campus and I wondered if it was in the policy manual, a kind of greeting like grocery store clerks -;^ who say hello to each customary at the cash register. I discovered it was a genuine concern. Berkeley has its problems, for sure. I was told that it has the lowest graduation rate in the UC system and that probably many fewer freshman finally end up with their degrees than Fresno State students. My specific experiences involved my duties as the second William Saroyan Visiting Professor of Armenian Studies. This endowed chair program has been trying for a decade to raise sufficient private funds to establish a regular fulltime position at UC Berkeley, similar to the ones at UCLA and Fresno State. In 1995 they bad enough of an endowment to invite a professor for one semester, thus creating a visiting position until such time as the endowment allowed for a regular professor. Administratively I was in four different sections of the university with four separate mailboxes! The Saroyan Chair is housed in the Slavic and East European Studies Program, which in turn is part of International and Area Studies. I taught an upper division English Department course on William Saroyan (only appropriateconcern- ing the clever naming ofthe chair) and a second course on Armenian Cinema in the Film Studies Program, part of the Department of Rhetoric. Each department integrated me wholly and offered me office space, a mailbox, an e-mail address, but unfortunately a computer only with great difficulty. Among the rewards of the experience was teaching William Saroyan to English majors, a rare occurrence for the Saroyan course aHvr-'~- ■ .-■• which at Fresno State is listed only under Armenian Studies. I was not surprised that some English majors had never read Saroyan, but I was disturbed thatseveral confessed that they had never heard of him. Of my 24 students, mostly English majors, only four were Armenian. Encouraged by their enthusiasm for the subject and the quality of their writing and thinking, I decided to organize a Saroyan conference to commemorate the 15th anniversary of the author's death. With class help, one student handled the publicity, another the conference program, we were able to invite the world's leading Saroyan scholars for a conference entitled "Saroyan Plus Fifteen" held on campus on November 15. Since the conference has been widely reported on, even in Hye Sharzhoom, I wish only to relate that aspect of it that was the most interesting to me. At first I thought, some of mese students could present papers on Saroyan as good as those of the professors being invited so why not extend the conference one day to have a student session? Class participation was optional and extra credit. Five students (all upper division English majors) were willing to try it. Eventually, only two stuck it out, Michael Kovacs and Michael Kloster, but they were joined by a third student, Micah Jendian from San Diego State, who had taken my Saroyan course in Fresno. In the end, I judged it would be segregation to put the three on a separate student panel and insisted that their papers be integrated into regular sessions of the conference. Certainly this was one of themostpositive experiences during my Berkeley stay. All the students were behind their classmates, who, ap- prehensive about being on the same platform with the very experts whose books they were quoting, wrote and rewrote their essays. They had a dry run in class with heavy questioning and criticism. I assured them continually that the work they were doing was as good as the experts and that the level of their own preparation would be on a par with that ofthe scholars present. In fact the three students, two undergraduates from Berkeley and one graduate from San Diego, gave what were recognized by everyone as three ofthe best papers in the conference. A member of Berkeley's own English Department also read a paper on Saroyan and the conference raised the conscience of English literature specialists, especially a new crop of them, toward the merits of Saroyan's craft. The experience in the film course was somewhat different, but equally surprising. A weekly showing and lecture in a large audio visual auditorium on Monday nights attracted 40 to 50 students, including in this course a large number of Armenian community auditors. The regular students were almost all film majors, 15 out of 25, only five of them Armenians. Obviously, film majors just look at movies differently than non-film majors. Thus, when discussing a film like Queen Christina directed by Rouben Mamoulian and starring Greta Garbo, they found Armenian connections that I never saw myself in the direction. Mamoulian never made a single film with Armenian content in it, yet the non-Armenian students especially continued to develop themes that turned around exile and Diaspora. This happened time and again with other films. On the other hand, some Armenian auditors always wanted to turn discussion of Armenian language films or even films by Atom Egoyan or William Saroyan toward its Armenian nationalist content; thus, on more than one occasion I was forced to move the post-film discussion toward the cinematographic qualities of a film. In a film course with determined film majors the quality of filming, scripting, acting, and overall cohesiveness is primary, and political or national messages secondary. The auditors hopefully learned something from the extraordinary input of young film specialists who had never previously seen a film by or about Armenians. Ultimately the most valuable part of such a teaching experience is to once again leave your home institution, your own students, to see how things are done elsewhere. It affords new perspectives and fires one up with new energies. In mid-December I discovered I had a fifth mailbox in the Program on undergraduate studies, and even though I found my first three pay vouchers two months late in my fourth mailbox, I just didn't have the courage to go across campus to empty one more. Who knows what I missed? Two Major Supporters of Armenian Studies Pass Away Within a week during the last days of February and the first days of March death came to Isabel Berberian and Meline' Kalfayan. Their names were familiar to hundreds of students and supporters of the Armenian Studies Program. The first endowed chair in Armenian Studies and the first chair to become operative on the campus of California State University, Fresno bears the name of Haig and Isabel Berberian. I have had the honor to be the first incumbent of that chair, named after the Berberians thanks to a most generous donation from Isabel and Haig's daughter Dianne and son-in-law Dr. Arnold Gazarian. Next year will mark the tenth anniversary ofthe Berberian endowment. Mrs. Berberian had been in failing health for many months. Her husband had passed away in 1987 and she continued herjife in Modesto surrounded by the Gazarians and her four grandchildren: Janalee married to Brian Melikian, Michelle married to Dr. John Arakelian, Rena married to Wayne Rutledge, and Alyssa. The Berberians, both Isabel and Haig, were characterized by discretion and gentleness. Their attachment to the Fresno community, including Armenian institutions like the church and the Armenians Studies Program and their generosity to it, is reflected in the continuing public service of the Gazarians. Arnold Gazarian serves as the Chair ofthe Armenian Studies Program Advisory Board and together with Dianne have stood behind us at all times. I also had the good fortune to teach two of Isabel Berberian's grandchildren, Rena and Alyssa. In one of those unlucky coincidences that life seems to reserve for us, Meline' Kalfayan passed away the day of Mrs. Berberian's funeral. She had been in and out the hospital frequently these past months, but seemed each time to bounce back with her perennial optimism. She and her husband Sarkis (Sam) Kalfayan established a special endowment fund in 1991 for the support ofthe newly created Center for Armenian Studies on the CSU Fresno campus. The Sarkis and Meline Kalfayan Center for Armenian Studies includes in it the John Garabedian Director's office, the Sahatdjian Library, and the Avedian Archives. As the first Director of the Kalfayan Center and the Armenian Studies Program it houses, I have felt assured of the future of Armenian Studies at Fresno State due in part to the Kalfayan endowment which will continue to benefit in the years and decades to come through the Kalfayan's estate. Sarkis Kalfayan served for six years as the first Chair ofthe Armenian Studies Program Advisory Board and he and Melin6 have stood steadfast in their support of Armenia and Armenian Studies. More than once in difficult moments, whether it be the need for computers at our sister institution, Yerevan State University, or aid to bring over exchange students from Armenia, Sarkis and Melin6 were ready to help. Melius was active in community affairs as member ofthe Eastern Star, Daughters ofthe Nile, and Daughters of the Vartan. I had the pleasure of Meline's gracious hospitality more than once. I also had met her father, the scholar Hovaness Babessian, at the Cilician Catholicosate in Antelias, Lebanon while he was doing research in the late 1950s. On behalf of the Armenian Studies Program, its faculty, staff, and students, and in the name ofthe Advisory Board, I would like to extend our deepest condolences to Dianne and Arnold Gazarian and their family and to Sarkis Kalfayan, and to thank mem for their constant support of our work. Dickran Kouymjian Haig & Isabel Berberian Professor of Armenian Studies Director, The Sarkis and Meline Kalfayan Center for Armenian Studies |